Skip to main content

The Languid Dead




Last night was episode 6 of Season 2 of AMC's hit series The Walking Dead. It's a show I came to late. Well, after a few episodes, anyway. The program premiered last year on Halloween, and I had little desire to watch yet another depiction of a zombie apocalypse (there's only been, what, 50 million such movies about the subject within the last decade or so?) At any rate, the first episode proved to be a monster success, and I kept hearing good things about the show, so I tuned-in around episode 4 of Season 1, got caught-up with everything during one of the many all-day marathons that AMC aired for it, and was suitably hooked. After 6 episodes, the show went on hiatus until this Autumn. So far, Season 2 has been a pale shadow of its predecessor, and last night's episode was part & parcel of why that is.

"Secrets" was about, well, secrets. Many characters on the program have them. This is one of the more frustrating aspects of Season 2. After firing the showrunner and half the writing staff (for budgetary reasons, mainly) AMC is left with a program that is simply bobbing along, and either boring or insulting most of its audience. I mean, there's nothing more frustrating than the audience knowing something that many characters on the show don't, and then knowing it for a long, long time. After a point, it removes you from the story, and instead of watching characters behaving in a realistic way, you start seeing the wheels turning in a writer's head. There's nothing that could suck the life out of a potential drama more than that.

Unless, of course, it's slowing down the pace of a program to the point that, after viewers have devoted an hour of their day to watching, they're left with the realization that, wow, nothing of substance really happened. Some might balk at such an opinion. I have a friend who considers the monotonous drone of the characters interactions this season to be a "slow burn" that is "building the tension." Perhaps. I look upon it as the slow death of a once-great television drama. It is possible to showcase both talking and action in such a way that they move the story along while still building character development. Season 1 of The Walking Dead was quite masterful at this. Season 2 has decided that a plethora of exposition, and relatively little plot advancement, is the way to go. A shame.

One more big problem with the current season of Walking Dead is that the titular "dead" seem like much less of a threat than they did in Season 1 of the program. Last year, when zombies showed-up, usually someone died (or was bitten, and then died later as a result). Seriously. It was chaos. Deathly chaos. And it's part of what made Season 1 such gripping television. In Season 2, we've seen a lot of zombies, but only very rarely death or serious injury as a result (I can think of one instance -- Otis). Instead, some zombies shuffle on-screen, and are dispatched with such efficiency that nearly all tension is drained from their scenes. Heck, now we're even looking at a developing plotline that might as well be titled: "Hey, Zombies Are People, Too!"  See, the thing is, when your show is about a zombie apocalypse, but then you all but neuter your zombie threat, then that sound you hear is the dread and suspense escaping from the program.

I know what some will say. Heck, the new showrunners are saying it already: 'This is about the characters.' No, I'm sorry, but it's not. Yes, of course a program has to have characters that people can identify with, or react to, but nearly every program has that. Yet not everyone watches the same programs. Why? Because they're drawn to different things for different reasons. Harry's Law is a legal drama. Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman was a gentle frontier story. Hell on Wheels is a tough-as-nails western. Bones is about forensic science mysteries. House is a medical drama. Now, true: They all have characters, and they all focus on them to some extent. But that's not primarily why people watch those shows. They are drawn to them, first and foremost, for the genre that they occupy. Characterization is then an important second.

The Walking Dead used to be be about the dangers encountered during a zombie apocalypse. Now, it's a sexed-up Little House on the Prairie. That's not why people started watching it. Sorry, it's just not. I've no desire to re-watch Season 2 of this series. It's not worth it. Nothing of substance really occurs. And, if it does, you realize it could have been whittled-down into a few episodes, instead of six (so far). For its own sake, I hope that The Walking Dead brings back the danger, the tense pacing, the anything-could-happen-at-any-moment atmosphere. Without it, it's just a nebulous drama. Judging from the readers' comments in this article, I'm not alone in thinking this.

Comments

  1. I'm a big fan of Walking Dead, but like you, I find this season disappointing. I've started downloading the original comic books in order to get my fix...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, I've been investigating the comics more recently, simply to see the plot moving along.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Agree 100%. Didn't realize much of the creative talent left the show after S1 - makes sense now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AMC is becoming notorious for its... ahem... frugality, of late. They've been either cancelling programs or cutting their budgets.

    According to an article I read, this because, unlike a lot of other cable channels that produce their own shows (TNT, USA, etc.) AMC finances everything on their own, instead of entering into joint partnerships with studios. This is proving to be financially constraining for them.

    So, yeah, they fired Frank Darabont (you know, THE Frank Darabont, Hollywood guy, known to be behind some really good films, and the showrunner for "Walking Dead" season 1. Anyway, AMC couldn't afford to pay him, so he went.

    Now we're seeing the results. :-/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If You Could Read My Mind

Dance clubs are a funny thing. They contain within their walls a life force and vibrancy sometimes unmatched anywhere else. When dusk settles and the lights come on, people will flood the dance floors to gyrate to music with hypnotic beats and songs about love, lust and fun at the disco. At gay bars, this sort of scenario usually increases ten-fold. It isn't for everyone, but for many it is a respite from the harsh realities of the real word. It is a place that isn't just a structure, but a sanctuary where folks -- minorities in their own communities -- can take shelter and unwind with abandon, at least for a few nighttime hours.
As someone who benefited greatly from such an aforementioned gay dance club, you can imagine my dismay at news of the closing of Chester Street Bar. In business for over three decades, gay-owned and operated, there was a time when C-Street (as it was known by most) was the only haven for those in the LGBT community, near and far, to enjoy themselves …

Third Death

My father has had three funerals. The third (though perhaps not final) one, was last night.
In reality, Lewis died in 1997. Cancer. Aged 52. He had a real funeral. I was there. The next two funerals occurred only in my dreams, yet they seemed real at the time, and their impact during the waking hours was keenly felt.
You see, during the intervening nineteen years, Lewis has come back to life in my dreams, many times. It is more than simply having a dream about him. During these nighttime images, it is noted that Lewis shouldn't be there, that he died of cancer and is resting six feet under. How, then, could he be alive and, seemingly, healthy?

Thoughts on an Election

Before I get started on the ruminations of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, I'll begin by saying I really have no clue as to who our next president will be. I've always fretted over the outcome of elections, regardless of the polls, and this year is no different. Especially this year. A good case can be made as to why Hillary Clinton will become our 45th president. All one has to do is look at the polls. Clinton has a comfortable lead in many states, enough to make one think that she will win handily on November 8th.
Of course, polls can be wrong. 538 gives Clinton's changes of winning in the low-mid 80 percent range. Several polls would seem to agree. Many Republicans are jumping ship from Trump. The race looks over. But of course, humanity isn't as easily predictable as polling would have us believe. Things happen. People can surprise us. And, for better or worse, I think that Donald Trump may very well become our next president.