First, I'm obviously not against someone's debate performance being analyzed. Heck, there are classes in public schools that are all about debate. So, that isn't the issue. What bothers me is how the performances are analyzed. Like, yeah, sure, have a poll asking folks what they thought of the debate, and who they thought did better. That's fine. It's the reactions I've been seeing primarily on social media that are concerning. It's like I'm back in school. Except, these are adults (at least in chronological age).
One thing I saw used a lot in people's responses was, "She brought the receipts!" That wasn't really a phrase back when I was growing up, so I couldn't immediately relate it to past overheard reactions, but it's in a similar vein. And, look, I can cut up with the best of 'em. I've not been above a few "Oh snaps!" and "Guuuurls" in my time, but not when it comes to something like a presidential debate. The stakes are too high. That's when adults need to adult. Shut the fuck up about receipts, ass whoopings, and all the rest of the catty, petty, schoolyard-type remarks. It does you no favors.
And this has nothing to do with who I support. Most people who know me, know that I will be voting for the Harris/Walz ticket in November. And yeah, I'm heartened to hear that it sounds like the vice-president did pretty well during the debate. That's all good. But, I dunno, I guess it just seems like there's a time and a place for some decorum? Then again, our national discourse has been crumbling for awhile, so maybe it shouldn't be surprising that a lot of adults cannot switch-off their teenage vernacular?
Some may argue that I'm arguing a point over what is basically the wild west that is social media, that it isn't reflective of real life, so just relax. I dunno -- maybe? But it's still a pretty pervasive, prominent dialogue for a lot of people. And it seems to shape how we view and see others, and even ourselves. It's unfortunate (and, admittedly, anecdotal), that I very rarely see any level-headed discussions online. It's usually one end of the spectrum or the other. It's either a bunch of people being dead serious about how they think we're in the end times, and that our world is "on fire," and that we're all doomed, or it's a bunch of people responding to serious events with a bunch of LOLing and talk of burns and receipts and daaaaangs.
You can be happy that your preferred candidate performed well in a debate. You can also be happy that a candidate who you dislike did not do so well. What's sad is when you revert to acting like a 15-year-old about it. This isn't RuPaul's Drag Race, or a game of Yo Momma jokes. This is about deciding who our next president will be. It is about the future of our democracy.
Those of us of a certain age will remember one of the 1992 presidential debates. The big deal that night was how incumbent President George H.W. Bush looked at his wristwatch at one point, seeming to be bored with the proceedings. He didn't go on a rant about illegal immigrants eating dogs or having sex change operations. God, how I pine for the days of 1992. And that's not something I ever expected to say.
Comments
Post a Comment