Skip to main content

Post-Television



The first five episodes of Doctor Who's Series 7 are airing this month worldwide. In much of the press for the new season, the creative forces behind the program haven't been shy about wanting to tell us how "cinematic" and "epic" the new episodes are/will be. Anyone with half-a-mind not to trust everything that is told them tend to yawn in reaction to such hype, yet I find the whole 'it's like a movie!' trend in television to be a curious thing.

The decision to have television programs look more like movies has been fairly obvious for at least a decade, if not longer. I'm sure there are reasons for why this was done, but it's often left me scratching my head a bit. Perhaps it's an antiquated notion but, for me, movies are movies and television is television. I've not felt the need for TV to look more cinematic. It's true that with widescreen TV sets, it's more sensible to film shows in widescreen format, but that's about it.

I remember watching a new set of episodes of a favorite program, Midsomer Murders. This was a few years ago, and suddenly the program's beginning changed noticeably. Instead of the theme song playing over the opening credits each episode, now the stories began simply with the title card flashed briefly on the screen, followed by the credits being displayed during the opening scenes, not unlike in a film. I missed the theme music. Thankfully, after a couple seasons, they put it back.

Now with Doctor Who, we have the production team outwardly proclaiming that their intent is to make the program look more like a film. Why? What's wrong with it just being a TV show? Other programs are doing the cinema-look thing, too: Luther, Copper, The Walking Dead, Boss, Mad Men Hell On Wheels, etc. It's baffling. Are people such fickle viewers -- so demanding of being entertained by style over substance -- that they require a more 'cinematic look' to their televisual programming?



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Yesterday's Restaurants

The local newspaper has a feature from one of Champaign-Urbana's most legendary restaurateur's, John Katsinas, on what his favorite area restaurants were that have now since closed (or will soon be closing).  It's a nice little read, and has made me stop and think about the restaurants that have come and gone that have left an indelible (and edible) impression on me throughout the years. Here we go....
Post a Comment
Read more

Watching The Hours

A Twitter friend named Paula has asked for folks to submit ideas for a blog-a-thon about what we think will be the classic films of the future. In other words, what relatively recent movies (namely, from the 21st century), do we think will be considered classics in the decades to come, possibly airing on such venerable stations as Turner Classic Movies ? While a number of films come to mind for such a category, one in particular stood out from the rest, and thus is my entry for Paula's blog-a-thon.
5 comments
Read more

She's Madonna

Today we're going to talk about something very important. We're going to talk about Madonna. "Madge," as she's affectionately known around the gay scene, has been making music for over thirty years. I grew up with her songs, many of them pop classics. In recent years, it can be arguably said that her popularity has waned a bit. During the past decade, Madonna has put out seventeen singles. Of those, three have charted in the US Top 40. Ten Failed to chart at all on the Billboard Hot 100. We now have at least one possibility offered as to why Madge's chart power is waning: Ageism. At least, that's what Diplo (just, Diplo), a producer of some of the tracks off her latest album, thinks . I know it's difficult to be objective about something you've worked on -- whether you were the producer or the artist -- but, as a listener/fan, I have to say that Madonna's most recent work has simply not been that good. Still, we'll hear what
Post a Comment
Read more