Skip to main content

Born This Way?




Actress Cynthia Nixon seems to be making headlines this week, due to remarks she made at a recent LGBT conference, in which she said that being gay/lesbian is a choice. Here's what she told the New York Times magazine:

“I gave a speech recently, an empowerment speech to a gay audience, and it included the line ‘I’ve been straight and I’ve been gay, and gay is better.’ And they tried to get me to change it, because they said it implies that homosexuality can be a choice. And for me, it is a choice. I understand that for many people it’s not, but for me it’s a choice, and you don’t get to define my gayness for me.”

Honestly, I'm not offended by Nixon's remarks. For one, she makes it clear that she's speaking for herself, and no one else. For another, I do think it's possible that being gay could, perhaps, be a choice for some. Now, before my gay brethren whip out the pitchforks, let me be clear: I believe sexuality to likely be a product of nature and nurture. After all, there are twins who have turned out to have different sexual orientations. And who is to say that whom we favor emotionally and sexually isn't influenced somewhat by our environment?

Of course, homosexuality has been observed in nature, outside of humanity (gay penguins, and what not), and most other animals don't have the ability to consciously decide to be one thing or the other, so that is definitely a point in the "born this way" box. And while that's all well and good, I'm still uneasy with using it as the centerpiece of the pro-gay rights argument.

I think that the nature position (whether true or not) is fraught with peril as it regards a rabbit hole of superfluous arguments. Being gay should be okay because, well, there's nothing wrong with it. Period. That would seem to be a stronger stance to take. Because even if a Christianist were to concede that sexuality is determined from birth, they might still argue that it is a sinful desire that should be quashed, for the sake of virtue. That is how many of the ultra-religious look upon most sinful temptations.

No, if we're serious about engaging folks in a well-meaning discussion on the acceptance of homosexuality, better to argue the point on more cerebral, not biological, grounds. For example: 'Gay people are typically well-adjusted individuals who live, love and endure just like anyone else, and are therefore of no harm to themselves or to others.' One might also add that, since most democracies are not, by definition, theocracies, the opinion of a religious majority should have no bearing when it comes to making laws.

While nature vs. nurture is an interesting aspect of the overall debate about society's acceptance of homosexuality, it should remain the domain of the scientists, geneticists and psychologists. It shouldn't be at the forefront of the main event. So while I can't remember ever making a conscious choice to be gay, and recollect being attracted to another guy way back when I was in kindergarten, I'll admit that, yeah, Cynthia Nixon probably did choose to be a lesbian. Others did not. And that's ok. I mean, most of us who are gay/lesbian probably could choose to be with someone of the opposite sex, but that would mean we'd 1) be unhappy, and 2) still be gay.

And life's too short for that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If You Could Read My Mind

Dance clubs are a funny thing. They contain within their walls a life force and vibrancy sometimes unmatched anywhere else. When dusk settles and the lights come on, people will flood the dance floors to gyrate to music with hypnotic beats and songs about love, lust and fun at the disco. At gay bars, this sort of scenario usually increases ten-fold. It isn't for everyone, but for many it is a respite from the harsh realities of the real word. It is a place that isn't just a structure, but a sanctuary where folks -- minorities in their own communities -- can take shelter and unwind with abandon, at least for a few nighttime hours.
As someone who benefited greatly from such an aforementioned gay dance club, you can imagine my dismay at news of the closing of Chester Street Bar. In business for over three decades, gay-owned and operated, there was a time when C-Street (as it was known by most) was the only haven for those in the LGBT community, near and far, to enjoy themselves …

Third Death

My father has had three funerals. The third (though perhaps not final) one, was last night.
In reality, Lewis died in 1997. Cancer. Aged 52. He had a real funeral. I was there. The next two funerals occurred only in my dreams, yet they seemed real at the time, and their impact during the waking hours was keenly felt.
You see, during the intervening nineteen years, Lewis has come back to life in my dreams, many times. It is more than simply having a dream about him. During these nighttime images, it is noted that Lewis shouldn't be there, that he died of cancer and is resting six feet under. How, then, could he be alive and, seemingly, healthy?

Thoughts on an Election

Before I get started on the ruminations of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, I'll begin by saying I really have no clue as to who our next president will be. I've always fretted over the outcome of elections, regardless of the polls, and this year is no different. Especially this year. A good case can be made as to why Hillary Clinton will become our 45th president. All one has to do is look at the polls. Clinton has a comfortable lead in many states, enough to make one think that she will win handily on November 8th.
Of course, polls can be wrong. 538 gives Clinton's changes of winning in the low-mid 80 percent range. Several polls would seem to agree. Many Republicans are jumping ship from Trump. The race looks over. But of course, humanity isn't as easily predictable as polling would have us believe. Things happen. People can surprise us. And, for better or worse, I think that Donald Trump may very well become our next president.