Skip to main content

No Compromise

One of my favorite bloggers, Kevin Drum, brings up one of the more troubling aspects of today's national political scene, namely: blind Obama-bashing:

Obama got virtually zero support for a stimulus bill designed to help get us out of the worst recession since World War II, he got no support for rescuing GM and Chrysler, he got no support for healthcare reform, and he got no support for financial reform even after a decade in which big banks were so far out of control they nearly wrecked the entire global economy. He's been attacked from Day 1 as non-American, non-Christian, and non-patriotic. The filibuster became not just a tool of intense opposition to big legislation, but an everyday tool of obstruction. Tea partiers and Glenn Beck accused him of being a socialist for sure, maybe a Muslim too, and quite possibly a fifth columnist as well. Rush Limbaugh mocks his wife and prominent GOP leaders make jokes about whether he was born in Kenya. A government shutdown isn't just something that might happen if Obama and Congress can't find a workable compromise on the budget, it's actively viewed as a positive goal. And, as Brownstein says, governors are no longer on the sidelines, sometimes working with the president and sometimes not depending on what's best for their state. They're fully enrolled in the war against Obama.
I can't remember the last time a presidency faced this type of opposition, especially so early on. What's more worrisome is how many of the American people -- regular folk -- have been swept up in the anti-Obama frenzy. Just the other day, a friend of mine whom I consider to a smart, intelligent person referred to healthcare reform as something that Obama was "ramming down our throats." What gives?

Lest we forget, healthcare reform was one of the issues that Obama campaigned on. He was duly-elected by a majority of the American voters. He tried working in a bi-partisan fashion with those across the aisle, but Republicans were having none of it. The bill that was eventually passed contained many items (including the mandate) that were suggestions from Republicans that were taken onboard by the Democratic majority in Congress, and yet the GOP still didn't vote to support it.

All of this begs the question: What exactly does the Republican Party think should be done with healthcare? Nothing? If nothing, then why? Why, for example, does every driver need to have auto insurance but, according to the GOP, do human bodies not require health insurance?

Unfortunately, what becomes apparent is that healthcare reform has never been prominent on the GOP radar. Neither have a lot of things that are major goals and concerns of the Democratic party and its voters. In the past, this wasn't such a huge problem. After all, there's a reason there are different political parties, and why folks choose to back one party over another. Folks have different ways of looking at the issues, and have different ideas of how those issues should be solved. With this understanding, our elected officials knew that if anything were to get done, they needed to act like adults and work together. They knew that they needed to (gasp!) compromise. Unfortunately, this seems to have been forgotten by those currently running the GOP and their supporters who watch FOX News.

I've heard from some conservatives that the elected Wisconsin Democrats who have fled their state in order to prevent passage of a bill that the GOP governor is refusing to compromise on should just return to their state and cast their losing vote against the bill. After all, Governor Walker campaigned against unions, and he was duly-elected by the voters of Wisconsin. It would be nice if those on the right employed the same line of thinking to the agenda of President Obama.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Yesterday's Restaurants

The local newspaper has a feature from one of Champaign-Urbana's most legendary restaurateur's, John Katsinas, on what his favorite area restaurants were that have now since closed (or will soon be closing).  It's a nice little read, and has made me stop and think about the restaurants that have come and gone that have left an indelible (and edible) impression on me throughout the years. Here we go....

Watching The Hours

A Twitter friend named Paula has asked for folks to submit ideas for a blog-a-thon about what we think will be the classic films of the future. In other words, what relatively recent movies (namely, from the 21st century), do we think will be considered classics in the decades to come, possibly airing on such venerable stations as Turner Classic Movies ? While a number of films come to mind for such a category, one in particular stood out from the rest, and thus is my entry for Paula's blog-a-thon.

She's Madonna

Today we're going to talk about something very important. We're going to talk about Madonna. "Madge," as she's affectionately known around the gay scene, has been making music for over thirty years. I grew up with her songs, many of them pop classics. In recent years, it can be arguably said that her popularity has waned a bit. During the past decade, Madonna has put out seventeen singles. Of those, three have charted in the US Top 40. Ten Failed to chart at all on the Billboard Hot 100. We now have at least one possibility offered as to why Madge's chart power is waning: Ageism. At least, that's what Diplo (just, Diplo), a producer of some of the tracks off her latest album, thinks . I know it's difficult to be objective about something you've worked on -- whether you were the producer or the artist -- but, as a listener/fan, I have to say that Madonna's most recent work has simply not been that good. Still, we'll hear what