Skip to main content

Whither Support?


A few years ago I was walking around the St. Louis Galleria during June. It was Pride Month and, as I made my way past the mall stores, noting how so many of them had pride flags in their windows, I became a tad misty-eyed marveling at how far we'd come. I couldn't help but think of younger Matt, back in the 1990s, who was terrified at the prospect of coming out, and wondered how much stronger he would have felt if he'd been able to see pride flags displayed at public places.

A gay friend I was with at the Galleria (and, honestly, I can't remember who it was now) scoffed at the displays, and his reaction caught me off guard. He bitterly remarked that it was just some hollow corporate show, put on because being gay was in vogue. I didn't really understand that because my mind was still cast back decades earlier to when seeing such an exhibition -- hollow or not -- just wouldn't have computed for me. I responded to the friend with something like, "Well, I still think it's nice. And if it helps a younger person struggling to come to terms with who they are, then it's something we should celebrate." My friend was nonplussed.

Fast forward to 2025, and we have a firmly anti-LGBT administration at the federal level, making threats of cutting off federal funding to any entity who supports DEI initiatives (which, of course, includes backing of the LGBT community), and now we're seeing how prescient my friend's view of corporate support really was. Look no further than St. Louis. Their annual Pridefest lost its main sponsor. A little to the west of St. Louis in St. Charles, Missouri, and we see that one of their primary Pride sponsors, Procter and Gamble, dropped their monetary support this year. This is just one year after the company reflected on its "longstanding commitment to advancing LGBTQ+ equality."  This isn't limited to just the St. Louis area. It has happened nationwide.

This isn't the case everywhere, of course. I've just returned from a trip to California. We flew Southwest Airlines, and among their in-flight offerings were LGBTQ Pride Month (labeled as such) films. I watched one of them (Am I OK?) on the way out there. Granted, there were just five movies to choose from, but hey, in the aforementioned current political climate, I'll take the wins where I can. And, while Anheuser-Busch has withdrawn its sponsorship from the St. Louis PrideFest this year, the St. Louis Cardinals (who are financially intertwined with Anheuser-Busch) still held their annual LGBTQIA+ Pride Night earlier this month. Indeed, several corporations are still showing support for the LGBT community this month. Many others, unfortunately, are not.

All of this brings to the fore two important points. One is that it is disconcerting (to say the least) to see the number of former supporters fold up their tents upon a change in government. It causes some concern as to what it could possibly portend for the future if the proverbial political waters get even more choppy. Second is that it shows who our allies truly are. It's one thing to show support for folks when there isn't much resistance, when everything is (comparatively) hunky-dory. It's when there's pushback, when the thing you supported is less popular than it once was, when we find out who's got our back.

Aa for St. Louis Pride, it's still happening next weekend, though the budgetary shortfall has to be made up somehow. Hence, after 45 years of free entry, PrideFest will be charging a $10 entry free to attend. That seems reasonable, though it's a shame they've had to do it at all. And, of course, even $10 isn't going to be easy for everyone to cough up -- particularly during these rough economic times -- and could prove to be a barrier for some. But, hey, the going got a little rough this year, and we've seen how Anheuser-Busch (and other corporations) basically got gone. It's their money, of course -- they can do what they want with it. But, this will certainly be remembered.

Anyway, Happy Pride Month!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Orby-D

Twenty-four-years ago today, we lost one of the greatest singers of the rock & roll era. While Roy Orbison will be forever known in the pantheon of rock/pop legends, for me he will always be the voice that I melded with during turbulent high school years, and that I love to this day. Roy Orbison wrote and (more importantly) sang about love. Mostly, it was tragic love, not the happy-go-lucky love that so many of his contemporaries sang about. No one could do depressive songs better than Mr. Orbison. This is probably why I identified with his music so much. I mean, we all have had our down times but, during high school, I'd cornered the market.

Watching The Hours

A Twitter friend named Paula has asked for folks to submit ideas for a blog-a-thon about what we think will be the classic films of the future. In other words, what relatively recent movies (namely, from the 21st century), do we think will be considered classics in the decades to come, possibly airing on such venerable stations as Turner Classic Movies ? While a number of films come to mind for such a category, one in particular stood out from the rest, and thus is my entry for Paula's blog-a-thon.

The Year in Music

There are times in your life when you will read or watch something, stop for a moment, and think to yourself: "This is truth. This is gospel, right here." For some, it may have been the first time you read the Bible, the Tanakh, or the Koran. For others, it could have been when you read self-help books such as The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People , or Chicken Soup for the Soul . Still, for others, it's going to be this blog post right here. The truth is, dear reader, that 1993 was the best year for music. Full-stop. Some of you already know this. For others, it will be a revelation. Please, allow me to explain. Following are some of the albums released in 1993, with a bit of commentary from yours truly. During or after reading this, I think you'll agree that there's really no question anymore that 1993 was king. Ok, here we go.