Skip to main content

In Whom We Trust


It is my contention that trust is overrated. We as a society seem to put a lot of faith in the concept of trust, whether it be in our business dealings, interpersonal relationships, or political leaders. I'm not saying that it is meaningless, or useless, just that we tend to rely too heavily on it. Trust, in and of itself, is not necessarily a good thing.

Allow me to explain.

The idea of putting too much faith into trust first arose when I was thinking about relationships. You will often hear people say how the foundation of a relationship is trust. If it is romantic in nature, sometimes folks will proclaim that, if their partner ever cheats on them, that's it - things are over between them. Without trust, they proclaim, there is nothing. Such a sentiment is understandable, but misguided.

Imagine you have a situation wherein a spouse is completely loyal to you. They never stray, they never cheat, their eyes never wander. You trust them. That's great, right? But what if that same spouse can also be trusted to beat your kids? What if he/she physically or verbally attacks your children? You can definitely say that you trust your spouse to abuse your offspring but, in that case, trust isn't such a good thing. Nor, in my opinion, is the trust you have in their sexual fidelity anything to really crow about in comparison.

What of trust in our political leaders? As I've become more politically aware over the years, that's something I've had to contend with. It seems pretty obvious to me that trust is what guides people's choices in not only their preferred candidates/leaders, but in their willingness to go along with those candidates'/leaders' decisions. This is why folks will nod their heads approvingly at Trump doing some of the same stuff Obama did, when they previously railed against the latter. They, for whatever reason, trust Trump, and do not trust Obama.

Should trust -- especially when it comes to our world leaders -- really be used to guide our preferences? There are things that President Obama has done that, objectively, I sometimes cringed at, but passively went along with because, well, I trusted him. So now we're left with a legacy where he expanded the powers of the presidency, and now must hand over the reigns to a man whom I do not trust. Of course, therein lies the folly. It never should have been about the person in the first place, but about the principles.

So, yes, trust can be a good thing. Definitely don't discard it, as it forms one of the building blocks of all our relationships. Perhaps, however, we should put a little less emphasis on it? Don't let things slide, simply because you trust someone. Don't think of trust as simply only ever a good thing, because it sometimes isn't. And, finally (most importantly?), understand that trust is a human concept, and that humans are innately flawed. We will very likely cause situations where trust will be lost. But, if you can, at least offer the chance for it to be rebuilt.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Yesterday's Restaurants

The local newspaper has a feature from one of Champaign-Urbana's most legendary restaurateur's, John Katsinas, on what his favorite area restaurants were that have now since closed (or will soon be closing).  It's a nice little read, and has made me stop and think about the restaurants that have come and gone that have left an indelible (and edible) impression on me throughout the years. Here we go....

Watching The Hours

A Twitter friend named Paula has asked for folks to submit ideas for a blog-a-thon about what we think will be the classic films of the future. In other words, what relatively recent movies (namely, from the 21st century), do we think will be considered classics in the decades to come, possibly airing on such venerable stations as Turner Classic Movies ? While a number of films come to mind for such a category, one in particular stood out from the rest, and thus is my entry for Paula's blog-a-thon.

She's Madonna

Today we're going to talk about something very important. We're going to talk about Madonna. "Madge," as she's affectionately known around the gay scene, has been making music for over thirty years. I grew up with her songs, many of them pop classics. In recent years, it can be arguably said that her popularity has waned a bit. During the past decade, Madonna has put out seventeen singles. Of those, three have charted in the US Top 40. Ten Failed to chart at all on the Billboard Hot 100. We now have at least one possibility offered as to why Madge's chart power is waning: Ageism. At least, that's what Diplo (just, Diplo), a producer of some of the tracks off her latest album, thinks . I know it's difficult to be objective about something you've worked on -- whether you were the producer or the artist -- but, as a listener/fan, I have to say that Madonna's most recent work has simply not been that good. Still, we'll hear what ...