Skip to main content

The Insect Who Lived


Odd how listening to satellite radio this morning, and observing a small bug crawling across a tiled bathroom floor later in the day, could evoke similar thoughts about the same subject, but then the mind works in it's own peculiar way sometimes. The subject is life after death, or, to be more precise, the existence (or not) of a soul. Contemplating such a topic is not unique to yours truly. It has vexed humankind for eons. This morning, however, gave me pause.

I'm in the car, listening to the radio. The Big '80s on 8 channel on Sirius/XM, because I'm old, and listen to the music of my childhood from three decades ago. Anyhow, it suddenly occurred to me -- in one of those bleary-eyed, morning stupors -- how remarkable it is that there all these real things that we cannot see, all around us. Wi-Fi, satellite radio, etc. they're there all the time, ready for their respective receptacles. It made me wonder: Could souls also be there, hanging about in the ether, and we just can't see them?

Fast forward a few hours later, I'm in a restroom, and happen to look down and there's a bug, or insect of some sort, crawling about on the floor. It was a small creature, but had the appearance of those creepy-crawly things that we tend to squash on impulse. As it neared me, I wanted to stomp on it, but suddenly refrained from doing so by the thought that it was a sentient being. It would, on occasion, stop, seem to take-in its surroundings, make a decision about how to proceed, and then continue on its way. If I killed it, what would its last moments be like? Would it feel pain? Would it linger, even for a few moments, before expiring?

I didn't squash the bug. It's probably still alive, going about its day in the bathroom, or in the walls of the building somewhere. As I felt some minor smugness at sparing its life, the thought briefly occurred to me, "Does it have a soul?" How different is it, really, from me?" The idea had presented itself before, of course. If -- and that is a very big "if" -- there is such a thing as a soul, who has one? Are they limited solely to humans, or do dogs, cats, sheep, wolves, lions, tigers, bears, and even little insects crawling around on bathroom floors have one? Heck, what about the little life forms we can only see with microscopes?

Where is the delineation -- or is there one -- for the concept of who or what has a soul?

Obviously, I don't have any answers, just postulations. What if satellite radio is akin to the soul? It exists, whether or not we can see it with our own eyes, and even if our car isn't on or tuned-in to it? But, once we select it, then there it is, the radio in our dash acting as a receptacle for the signal. What if souls are like signals, unseen, waiting for the right human receptacles to allow for their fruition? I've always wondered how the whole soul/body thing is supposed to work. Maybe Sirius/XM inadvertently provided an answer?

And why wouldn't there be souls for creatures other than humans? Surely it isn't something that would be exclusive for ourselves? Of course, this all presupposes that souls actually exist, which I am not fully convinced of. They are a rather fanciful notion overall, providing us with more questions than answers. For one: If life exists elsewhere in the universe, do souls get to inhabit organic receptacles there, as well? Is human life on Earth their only experience (aside from the mystical, other-dimensional Heaven concept, with it various permutations across different religions)?

I hope that bug's having a good day.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Yesterday's Restaurants

The local newspaper has a feature from one of Champaign-Urbana's most legendary restaurateur's, John Katsinas, on what his favorite area restaurants were that have now since closed (or will soon be closing).  It's a nice little read, and has made me stop and think about the restaurants that have come and gone that have left an indelible (and edible) impression on me throughout the years. Here we go....

Watching The Hours

A Twitter friend named Paula has asked for folks to submit ideas for a blog-a-thon about what we think will be the classic films of the future. In other words, what relatively recent movies (namely, from the 21st century), do we think will be considered classics in the decades to come, possibly airing on such venerable stations as Turner Classic Movies ? While a number of films come to mind for such a category, one in particular stood out from the rest, and thus is my entry for Paula's blog-a-thon.

She's Madonna

Today we're going to talk about something very important. We're going to talk about Madonna. "Madge," as she's affectionately known around the gay scene, has been making music for over thirty years. I grew up with her songs, many of them pop classics. In recent years, it can be arguably said that her popularity has waned a bit. During the past decade, Madonna has put out seventeen singles. Of those, three have charted in the US Top 40. Ten Failed to chart at all on the Billboard Hot 100. We now have at least one possibility offered as to why Madge's chart power is waning: Ageism. At least, that's what Diplo (just, Diplo), a producer of some of the tracks off her latest album, thinks . I know it's difficult to be objective about something you've worked on -- whether you were the producer or the artist -- but, as a listener/fan, I have to say that Madonna's most recent work has simply not been that good. Still, we'll hear what ...